9.10.2008

Good Argument to Vote Obama

Makes it for libertarians, but I think the arguments can be plainly applied to any political philosophy.

3 comments:

Eric Dondero said...

The leadership of the Libertarian Party of Alaska endorsed Palin for Governor in 2006. She spoke to two LP meetings that year at their invite. Even her Libertarian opponent in the race Billy Toien endorsed her the last 3 days, telling his supporters to "vote for Sarah."

I wonder if the Libertarian Party of Illinois has ever supported Obama? Somehow, I think not.

J said...

I find it more useful in Presidential races to generally vote for one of the candidates running for President, not Vice President. Dummy.

Paddy said...

I would also say that both the Libertarian position and the Republican Party are not what they were in 2006.

The current Libertarian discourse seems to be centered around the idea that the Republican Party is in clearly and unhesistatingly marching away from its Libertarian roots. That is, this current administration (no matter where you stand in the political spectrum) has unquestionably expanded government in both foreign and domestic arenas--more war, domestic spying, government subsidies and government-sponsored programs, etc. To Libertarians, I think (although I can't assume to know everything about their positions), this is dangerous and cause for a reassessment of their allegiances. At the very least, the move will put the Republicans in check and force them to reassess the party's position--certainly, it doesn't mean that they now agree more with the Democratic platform.

Ron Paul is a great case in point. He publicly identifies himself with Republicans (most likely because he knows that the two party system has a strangle-hold on US politics) but clearly has Libertarian leanings. Today, he announced that he is supporting a thrid-party candidate. It seems clear, for Paul at least, that the Republicans need to reign themselves in.